Japanese and Korean line boundaries
Use supported boundary evidence with a competent language review.
Understand the principle
Japanese and Korean typography have supported boundary and punctuation conventions that should not be replaced with assumptions from space-delimited Latin prose. The registry’s locale choice is a starting point for targeted review, not a complete editorial certification.
Look in Typography. The publication concept and a plugin issue identifier are related, but are not interchangeable.
Compare the intent, not only the characters
A prohibited punctuation pattern appears at a composed line boundary.
A line boundary consistent with the intended language and layout.
Schematic teaching example, not a plugin screenshot or a promise of automatic correction.
Review it in Avellio 2.0
Confirm the actual paragraph language, characters and host composition settings. Read the exact finding in its line context. Review the intended convention with a competent language editor before changing text or composition. Read Found and Suggested when offered, or Review in context. Check Text locale; the recommendation itself changes no text. After an intentional manual edit, inspect again.
Use the selected finding’s actual evidence and offered actions. If no suitable supported action exists, make a justified manual decision in InDesign or retain the occurrence. After an edit, inspect again and check nearby composition.
Read the plugin recommendation
Review the language-specific line-break settings and the punctuation at this boundary.
Read-only advice: verify meaning and locale, edit deliberately when justified, then inspect again.
When the difference can be intentional
Quoted foreign material, specialist layout and incomplete evidence can alter the decision. The schematic example does not specify a universal character replacement.
What should I verify after deciding?
Preserve meaning and the intended design. If you edited the document, obtain fresh results for the intended scope and policy. If you kept the occurrence, record a supported review decision when useful. A smaller filtered count is not proof of a repair.