Comparison Guide
Choose the right quality-control layer for your InDesign work: Avellio, Preflight, GREP and human review.
Use this guide to decide where to start, which evidence to trust and how to verify the result. Explore seven short parts, 16 task comparisons and eight worked examples.
Will the file meet our output conditions?
Check the job’s configured technical requirements and intended coverage.
Where should we inspect typography, styles and composition?
Locate supported evidence, understand context and verify a justified decision.
Do we already know the exact pattern and change?
Run a tested expression with deliberate formatting criteria and scope.
Is the result correct, appropriate and ready to approve?
Own meaning, intentional design, source accuracy and the final proof.
Choose the right quality layer
Understand the four roles and the questions each can answer.
Read this part →Compare by task
Filter 16 practical tasks and compare evidence, actions and verification.
Read this part →Eight worked examples
Follow realistic decisions from a green status to a useful proof.
Read this part →Understand what an action changes
Separate inspection, marks, review statuses, proposals and live document changes.
Read this part →Choose a production workflow
Combine tools for editorial work, imported copy, multilingual text and delivery.
Read this part →Agree on team evidence and sign-off
Define ownership, acceptance gates and meaningful comparisons.
Read this part →Coming from the 1.1 comparison guides
Translate old terminology into the current UXP workflow without assuming feature parity.
Read this part →Sources and current boundaries
Avellio guidance describes build 2.0.5 source review within the 2.0.0 documentation collection. Read the current delivery boundaries and compatibility evidence. This comparison does not claim fresh native-host acceptance.