Numeric grouping and decimal separators
Keep numeric value separate from its regional presentation.
Understand the principle
Separators can indicate decimal fractions or digit groups under different conventions. A visual inconsistency may be an error or deliberately retained source data. Locale-specific expectations and the publication’s own standard must be considered together.
Look in Typography. The publication concept and a plugin issue identifier are related, but are not interchangeable.
Compare the intent, not only the characters
1,234.56 beside 1.234,56
One intended presentation, with the original values retained.
Schematic teaching example, not a plugin screenshot or a promise of automatic correction.
Review it in Avellio 2.0
Verify the source value and selected policy before replacing punctuation. Review tables and footnotes separately where coverage is limited. After an edit, compare the displayed value with the source and inspect composition. Read Found and Suggested when offered, or Review in context. Check Text locale; the recommendation itself changes no text. After an intentional manual edit, inspect again.
Use the selected finding’s actual evidence and offered actions. If no suitable supported action exists, make a justified manual decision in InDesign or retain the occurrence. After an edit, inspect again and check nearby composition.
Read the plugin recommendation
Check decimal and grouping separators without changing the numeric value.
Read-only advice: verify meaning and locale, edit deliberately when justified, then inspect again.
When the difference can be intentional
Identifiers, code and mixed-language data can require literal preservation. Matching formatting does not establish factual numeric accuracy.
What should I verify after deciding?
Preserve meaning and the intended design. If you edited the document, obtain fresh results for the intended scope and policy. If you kept the occurrence, record a supported review decision when useful. A smaller filtered count is not proof of a repair.
Use it in a real workflow
Review a book or publication
Build comparable chapter evidence without confusing an open-document queue with complete Book coverage.
Follow the workflow →Keep a team inspection standard consistent
Separate a selected library profile, an unsaved draft and the settings actually used for a scan.
Follow the workflow →