Team workflow and handoff
The full operational, safety, workflow, reporting, locale, and issue reference.
Avellio is most valuable when the team agrees who interprets each kind of evidence. The product supplies findings and reports; the team owns the editorial and design decisions.
| Role | Primary Avellio responsibility | Recommended handoff evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Designer / template owner | Style Heatmap, Override Detection, Style Hygiene, hierarchy, rhythm, grid and layout findings | Style Audit Summary and Override Report |
| Editor / proofreader | Copy, punctuation, quote, semantic, locale and repeated-word findings | Filtered Typography Report with decisions |
| Production specialist | Break Audit, scope, threading, report freshness, diagnostics cleanup and final proof | Final Typography and Fix Reports plus delivery checklist |
| Language reviewer | Paragraph language, resolved locale, quote, date, number, currency and abbreviation conventions | Locale-related CSV columns and accepted exceptions |
| Project lead | Consistent profile, scope and thresholds across milestones | Recorded audit settings, version and final report set |
Record accepted exceptions
The production release does not include a complete user-facing occurrence-level suppression manager. For team work, keep a short external acceptance log containing:
- issue type;
- page or story;
- affected style;
- reason the finding is intentional;
- reviewer and date;
- whether the exception must be rechecked after reflow.
This prevents the next operator from “fixing” an intentional design choice and provides context when counts remain above zero.
Make reports useful to the recipient
Do not send an unfiltered CSV without explaining the audit conditions. Include:
- Avellio version;
- profile and semantic strictness;
- locale mode;
- analysis scope and threaded-story setting;
- any changed thresholds;
- whether the report comes from the final full audit;
- which findings are resolved, accepted, or still awaiting review.
Performance planning
Choose the least expensive mode that answers the current question, then use the full audit at the production milestone.
| Need | Efficient starting choice | When to expand |
|---|---|---|
| Quick local composition check | Current Spread, Native Shading, focused checks | Expand after the layout stabilizes. |
| Repeated editing feedback | Incremental Updates and Live Mode | Run a full audit before reports or fixes. |
| Style distribution overview | Style Heatmap with Co.Text | Add Override Detection when local formatting risk matters. |
| Local override QA | Normal sensitivity and relevant filters | Use Strict only for tightly governed templates. |
| River analysis | Selection, short story, or small Page Range | Expand only if geometry performance is acceptable. |
| Long publication QA | Representative chapter, then staged Page Ranges | Finish with the agreed full-document audit. |
| Maximum internal coverage | Deep Audit | Use after faster profiles have established the baseline. |
Success looks like: every recipient understands what was checked, what remains a human decision, and whether the report is current enough to support delivery.
Release sourceThis page was generated from the Markdown companion of the verified distribution PDF.